What Kind of "Rocket" Is Needed to Deliver mRNA?

On June 5, 2022, at 10:44 AM, China
launched the Shenzhou-14 manned spacecraft from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch
Center using the Long March-2F Y14 rocket, carrying astronauts Chen Dong, Liu
Yang, and Cai Xuzhe into space for a six-month mission to complete various
assigned tasks.
mRNA has a half-life of
approximately 7 hours , a large molecular weight (10⁴–10⁶ Da) , and carries a negative
charge under physiological pH conditions —making it difficult to cross
the cell membrane composed of anionic lipids. It is also readily
degraded by nucleases in vivo. These obstacles have hindered the
delivery of mRNA into the human body and its successful translation into
clinical applications. Therefore, it is also necessary to design a "rocket" —a
suitable delivery system—to achieve mRNA delivery, ensuring that mRNA reaches
target cells safely, is protected from nuclease degradation, and promotes
cellular uptake without causing toxicity or unwanted immunogenicity.
Advances in delivery technology have
greatly promoted the development and clinical application of the mRNA
pharmaceutical industry. Methods for delivering mRNA include physical
methods , viral vector methods , and non-viral
vector methods.
Among these, electroporation and
gene guns are classic physical methods for mRNA delivery, but clinical
trials have shown that these methods are often harmful to cells and unsuitable
for in vivo application. Currently, development strategies for mRNA delivery
carriers focus on two major directions: viral vectors and non-viral
vectors.
Viral vectors such as lentivirus and adeno-associated virus (AAV) have very
high delivery efficiency and can ensure long-term gene expression,
making them the most widely used nucleic acid delivery carriers in clinical
practice. However, viral vectors have key defects—including risks associated
with genomic integration , host rejection
(immunogenicity and cytotoxicity) , limited payload packaging
capacity, and manufacturing difficulties. These safety, stability, and efficacy
issues have significantly limited the application of viral vectors in clinical
use.
In contrast, non-viral vectors —as
the "rocket"—can effectively protect the mRNA "astronauts"
from external environmental influences or nucleases. They generally have lower
immunogenicity , higher safety , are relatively convenient
to design and synthesize , easy to produce , and
allow repeat administration. For these reasons, they are considered
ideal carriers for mRNA delivery and have developed rapidly in recent years.
Non-viral vectors mainly include liposomes , dendrimers , inorganic
nanoparticles , cationic cell-penetrating peptides ,
and others. Liposomes and their derivatives have become the
most effective non-viral vectors for mRNA delivery. The main lipid carriers
used for mRNA drug delivery include lipoplexes (LP) , lipopolyplexes
(LPR) , Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP) , and cationic
nanoemulsions (CNE) .
Non-viral delivery systems represented
by LNPs can effectively load mRNA and transfect cells, express
specific antibodies, and activate immune responses—demonstrating good clinical
efficacy in combating COVID-19 infection.
While the design and stability of mRNA
itself are prerequisites, the efficiency of the delivery system is
equally critical, as it determines the therapeutic efficacy of mRNA drugs in
real-world applications. However, drug delivery is a complex problem that
connects the intrinsic properties of drugs with the variable microenvironments
of the human body—requiring knowledge spanning biology, materials science,
chemistry, pharmacology, and medicine.
In 2020, Jennifer Doudna —who
received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for her outstanding contributions
to CRISPR—once remarked: "Delivery may remain the biggest
bottleneck for somatic cell gene editing."
Today, we do not know when the next
unforeseeable "COVID-19" crisis will arrive. The lessons of past
failures and the experience gained in the present are valuable assets for
developing future drug delivery technologies. What we can and should do is
to continuously accumulate success from failure —"prepare
one, reserve one" , "prepare one, reserve two" ,
or even "prepare one, reserve three or four" —creating
more innovative drug delivery technologies and always being ready for
"launch" to meet current and future clinical needs.



